[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James E Wilson) wrote on 10.03.05 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:48, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > This isn't a source-level modification, by definition. > > And I could argue that my suggestion isn't a source-level modification > either, or I could argue that your suggestion really is a source-level > modification, but it seems pointless to argue about this. I'm not sure it's pointless when it's about fundamental vocabulary. I, and presumably Hans-Peter too, think a source-level modification is pretty much defined by taking an editor to the source file. If you can use the unchanged source file, then it's not a source-level modification. MfG Kai
