On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:07:33 +0100, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:30:40 -0800, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greg Schafer wrote: > > > > > This is rather critical, yet a bugmaster saw fit to remove the 4.0.0 > > > target > > > milestone on this bug: > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166 > > > > > > Any chance of making this one a high priority? > > > > I've restored the target milestone, but I've marked this as low > > priority. It would be good to fix this (by modifying fixincludes), but > > in the end, if push comes to shove, we'll probably just not bother. > > > > So, I would suggest that you try to fix this yourself, and submit a patch. > > Am I right that the supposed fixinclude has to change > > /* Function used in the macros. */ > struct __jmp_buf_tag; > extern int __sigsetjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __env[1], int __savemask) > __THROW; > > to > > /* Function used in the macros. */ > struct __jmp_buf_tag; > extern int __sigsetjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag *__env, int __savemask) __THROW; > > ? If so, I'll take some spare minutes I have today and make a patch.
Like this one, which is completely untested because I lack autogen and compiling it requires guile (ugh) which is not installed and I'm not going to build that now. Maybe someone can take this "first try" and finish it. Thanks, RIchard.
p
Description: Binary data
