Hello, > >I think I will try the later fix today (mostly because I no longer > >remember what exactly were the problems that lead me to introducing > >the TREE_OVERFLOW check to is_gimple_min_invariant). > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg00786.html > And yes the testcase still fails when you remove TREE_OVERFLOW from > is_gimple_min_invariant, at least it did three weeks ago when I tried > this.
actually, it does not for me (after fixing a trivial problem in find_taken_edge_cond_expr). I am now bootstrapping and regtesting the patch on every architecture I have access to. Zdenek
