On 2005-03-10 01:01:18 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > No. I mean when I call powi() either through built-ins or appropriate > overload (several programming languages do so), I expect sane semantics.
What is powi()? I couldn't find it in the C standard. It isn't in the Linux man pages either. > The asseryion that 0^0 is mathematically undefined is not a bogus > reason. It is a fact. I disagree. One can mathematically define 0^0 as 1. One often does this. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
