On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:48:06 +0100, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... which do not handle promotions. So you do not consider useful to have a
> min/max operator with promotion (so that it would work exactly like any
> other operator) just because there is a cheap version without promotion. And
> my statement that min() and max() are not exact replacements still stands.
If you wish for a min/max with promotion, why not implement
alternative versions of those two template functions? With typeof
going into the standard and already being a available in gcc, it
should be easy to deduce the return type.
> for (int i=0;i<100;i++)
> {
> float cur = Compute(i) * factor;
> if (max_computed < cur)
> max_computed = cur;
> }
for (int i=0;i<100;i++)
max_computed = std::max(Compute(i) * factor, max_computed);
Rakshasa
--
http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ - BitTorrent library and client for *nix.
