> I must admit that my first description of the problem was a bit outdated, > but I will give you some more information: I first tried the > gcc-4.0-10012005 snapshot, together with the -fno-exceptions flag, and > there was no dynamic linking of libgcc_s.so necessary. gcc-3.4.3 works in > the same way, no dynamic linking necessary. With the newest snapshot > gcc-4.0-07032005 there is dynamic linking necessary. The code is written in > C++, but there is no exception handling.
That's a bit odd. However we would need more information to properly diagnose the problem, if any. -- Eric Botcazou
