"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > > look at the ChangeLog for the appropriate year. This is also how some > > other GNU programs organize their ChangeLog files, including libhava > > and libstdc++-v3. > > Not consistently, however. libjava/ChangeLog-1999 has entries from 1998, > libjava/ChangeLog-2001 has entries from 2000, libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog-2000 > has entries from 1998 and 1999. Perhaps a followup patch could also fix > those?
Sure, I'll volunteer to tackle that, if the first patch is approved. Offlist Daniel Berlin mentioned that maybe any such renaming should wait until we move to a version control system which supports file renaming (if indeed we do move). Personally I don't think it matters since I don't think anybody really cares about doing "cvs log" or "cvs annotate" (or equivalent) on a ChangeLog file. But if anybody feels differently, please speak up now. Ian
