On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:35:28 +0100, Eric Botcazou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> also on 4.0 branch, LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar  3 12:00:26 UTC 2005
> > >
> > > Sure?  The suspected patch is not present on that branch.
> >
> > Was this fixed with my/Roger's patch which went in this morning (EST)?
> 
> I'm not convinced this has ever failed on the 4.0 branch, and I don't see any
> patch from you or Roger there, so I presume you're confusing with mainline.

I'm sorry, of course are you right Eric, this was not failing on the
4.0 branch, I just happen to check the wrong dir...

-- 
Cheers,

/ChJ

Reply via email to