On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > That is, there won't be > > any problems like those mentioned in comments in bugzilla-checkout and > > htdocs-checkout and cgibin-checkout with the new scripts. > > I don't understand what the real problem is, because the comments claim > something that is so strange to me i have a hard time believing it. > I can tell you you can run multiple scripts, and it will properly > substitute things, etc. > So in fact, it seems like the checkout scripts don't need to send mail > like they do now.
I don't know the real cause, but the mere existence of the log_accum system where CVS runs a script for each directory and the script needs to merge the logs and send a single message if it's on the last directory (rather than just having a hook for the whole commit) seems rather fragile and a way in which CVS is simply broken which can be avoided with SVN. Will wwwdocs be handled as a separate repository (with its own repository revision numbers) or as a directory in a single GCC repository? (I don't know if anything else in the existing repository, e.g. "benchmarks", is live to need conversion to SVN rather than just staying available read-only from the old repository.) -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
