> I can only wonder why we are having this discussion just after GCC 4.0
> was branched, while it was obvious already two years ago that inlining
> heuristics were going to be a difficult item with tree-ssa.

There were of course complaints and discussions about this, and I even
tried to tweak inlining parameters once.  See the audit trails of PR7863 and
PR8704.  There were people telling me "well in branch XYZ we do so much
better", as always, so I was not encouraged to persue this further.

Anyway, I think we should try the patch on mainline and I'll plan to re-submit
it together with a 10% lowering of the inlining parameters compared to 3.4
(this is conservative for the mean size change for C code, for C++ we're
still too high).  I personally cannot afford to do so much testing to please
everyone.

Richard.

Reply via email to