Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs

[Dylan Cuthbert]

Ah, ok, sorry about that, I read it as being the equivalent of the whole 
operation.

I'll throw op1 in there, thanks again.
Dylan
"James E Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dylan Cuthbert wrote:
For the last parameter (equiv) of emit_no_conflict_block I am putting in 
"gen_rtx_SET ( V16SFmode, op0, op1 )", does this seem correct to you?
This is supposed to be the value of op0 after the no conflict block.  So 
it should just be op1.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com