On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:16:29PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:59:00PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > >>I suspect that the problem is that the transformations > >>fold_indirect_ref_1 > >>is doing on arrays don't mix well with how fortran handles arrays. > > > >I have been trying to look at the problem in the BLAS sources, > >and I find it hard to debug because it goes away when print > >statements are added to the source (I hate that...) > > > > Wasn't this fixed by my patch which I applied this morning: > > 2005-02-18 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR middle-end/20030 > * fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Use the correct index for > zero access, > the lower bound of the array type if it exists. >
Yes, your patch fixed the problem. -- Steve
