On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:40 -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > On Friday, February 11, 2005, at 05:29 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > I'll keep the last branchpoint of each branch for the initial import > > Won't work either... Sometimes we reuses merge labels in non-obvious > ways. top-200501-merge and top-200502-merge both exist, the two were > used for, say, treeprofiling, and then a random other (important) > branch uses the first for its merge. > > Also, even if you could track those down (you can't), it still would > obliterate merge auditing, which is a very useful feature to find how > exactly how someone screwed up a past merge. > > I don't see the advantage of wiping those labels yet.
> > If you left all labels mentioned in any log entry, that would almost > solve most instances that I know about, but, sometimes people misspell > the tags in obvious ways in the log messages. > Fine, i'll just keep all the non-snapshot tags for now.
