Hi Kirill, On Friday 2014-12-12 14:43, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > These change adds mention of OpenMP4 offloading support in GCC: in > release notes and in news section of main page.
good you thought of that, thank you! > Index: htdocs/index.html > =================================================================== > + <dt><span>OpenMP 4.0 offloading support in GCC</span> > + <span class="date">[2014-12-12]</span></dt> > + <dd><a href="http://www.openmp.org/mp-documents/OpenMP4.0.0.pdf"> > + OpenMP 4.0</a> offloading features support was added to GCC. Generic > changes: How about omitting "features" in the above? > + <li>Generic infrastructure (suitable for any vendor).</li> > + <li>Testsuite which covers offloading from > + <a href="http://openmp.org/mp-documents/OpenMP4.0.0.Examples.pdf"> > + OpenMP 4.0 Examples</a> document.</li> "from the" > + Specific for upcoming Intel MIC products: Is everyone aware what MIC stands for, or is that the marketing name? > + <li>Runtime library.</li> I believe that would be "run-time library"? > + Contributed by Jakub Jelinek (RedHat), Thomas Schwinge (CodeSourcery), Red Hat. It's Red Hat. Two words. Why does "everybody" get this wrong? > + Bernd Schmidt (CodeSourcery), Andrey Turetskiy (Intel), > + Ilya Verbin (Intel) and Kirill Yukhin (Intel).</dd></dt> How about if you contract this to "Thomas Schwinge and Bernd Schmidt (CodeSourcery)" and similarly for you guys from Intel? Incidently the alphabetical ordering nicely supports this here. Note: Schwinge > Schmidt, so I think you'll want to switch those two. That said, overall this is a bit too long for an entry on the home page. Can you put all those details in the gcc-5/changes.html page (this is good material) and link to it from a shortened entry for the home page? > Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html > =================================================================== > <h2 id="languages">New Languages and Language specific > improvements</h2> + <ul> + <li><a > href="http://www.openmp.org/mp-documents/OpenMP4.0.0.pdf"> OpenMP 4.0 > + specification</a> offloading features are now supported in C/C++ and > + Fortran compiler</li> + </ul> "supported by the C, C++ and Fortran compilers" (plural) (This adds "the", but also splits C and C++ which really are to different compilers in many ways. No need to be shy. ;-) Given the number of suggestions, in this case I'd prefer to have another look at an updated version. Now that I am back online, I should be able to turn this quickly. Gerald