Thanks. Ccing release manager for their opinion. Best regards,
Thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwak...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 5:33 PM > To: Thomas Preud'homme > Cc: Tony Wang; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; d...@debian.org; aph- > g...@littlepinkcloud.com; Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan; > libstd...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Patch, ARM, ping1] Fix PR target/56846 > > On 26/11/14 17:23 -0000, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > >Ping? > > I'm OK with backporting it if a release manager approves it. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > >> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:00 PM > >> To: Tony Wang; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; d...@debian.org; aph- > >> g...@littlepinkcloud.com; Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan; > >> libstd...@gcc.gnu.org > >> Subject: RE: [Patch ARM] Fix PR target/56846 > >> > >> > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > >> > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tony Wang > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > The bug is reported at > >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846, and it’s about > the > >> > problem that > >> > when exception handler is involved in the function, then > >> > _Unwind_Backtrace function will run into deadloop on > >> > arm target. > >> > >> The patch (in r215101) can be backported without any change on 4.8 > and > >> 4.9 branches. I checked in QEMU with and without the patch on both > >> branches and it indeed solves the problem. > >> > >> Testsuite run without regression when compiled with arm-none-eabi > >> cross compiler and executed on QEMU emulating Cortex-M3. > >> > >> I also bootstrapped gcc on x86_64-linux-gnu and run the testsuite > >> without > >> regressions. > >> > >> Is it ok for backport? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
