On 26/11/14 17:23 -0000, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Ping?
I'm OK with backporting it if a release manager approves it.
-----Original Message----- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:00 PM To: Tony Wang; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; d...@debian.org; aph- g...@littlepinkcloud.com; Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan; libstd...@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: [Patch ARM] Fix PR target/56846 > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tony Wang > > > Hi all, > > The bug is reported at > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846, and it’s about the > problem that > when exception handler is involved in the function, then > _Unwind_Backtrace function will run into deadloop on > arm target. The patch (in r215101) can be backported without any change on 4.8 and 4.9 branches. I checked in QEMU with and without the patch on both branches and it indeed solves the problem. Testsuite run without regression when compiled with arm-none-eabi cross compiler and executed on QEMU emulating Cortex-M3. I also bootstrapped gcc on x86_64-linux-gnu and run the testsuite without regressions. Is it ok for backport? Best regards, Thomas
