On 2014.11.03 at 08:47 -0600, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/03/2014 05:27 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > BTW both EDG and clang reject g++.dg/template/spec17.C:
> >
> > namespace io {
> > template <typename> int foo();
> > }
> > using namespace io;
> > template<> int foo<int>();
> >
> > But I think it is a reasonable extension to accept it.
>
> We should reject it, too. We can only leave out the namespace
> qualification with inline namespaces.
Where would be the best place to check for this issue?
> > +// { dg-options "-pedantic -pedantic-errors" }
>
> You shouldn't need these dg-options lines; if a testcase has no
> dg-options line, -pedantic-errors is the default.
OK. Fixed.
--
Markus
