2014-10-14 1:11 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>: > On 10/08/14 12:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This patch starts a series which is a result of split of Pointer Bounds >> Checker patch #14 (Pointer Bounds Checker passes). >> >> This patch introduces compiler flags used by checker and helper functions >> mostly used by expand pass. >> >> Thanks, >> Ilya >> -- >> 2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkov...@intel.com> >> >> * tree-chkp.c: New. >> * tree-chkp.h: New. >> * rtl-chkp.c: New. >> * rtl-chkp.h: New. >> * Makefile.in (OBJS): Add rtl-chkp.o and tree-chkp.o. >> (GTFILES): Add tree-chkp.c. >> * c-family/c.opt (fchkp-check-incomplete-type): New. >> (fchkp-zero-input-bounds-for-main): New. >> (fchkp-first-field-has-own-bounds): New. >> (fchkp-narrow-bounds): New. >> (fchkp-narrow-to-innermost-array): New. >> (fchkp-optimize): New. >> (fchkp-use-fast-string-functions): New. >> (fchkp-use-nochk-string-functions): New. >> (fchkp-use-static-bounds): New. >> (fchkp-use-static-const-bounds): New. >> (fchkp-treat-zero-dynamic-size-as-infinite): New. >> (fchkp-check-read): New. >> (fchkp-check-write): New. >> (fchkp-store-bounds): New. >> (fchkp-instrument-calls): New. >> (fchkp-instrument-marked-only): New. >> * cppbuiltin.c (define_builtin_macros_for_compilation_flags): Add >> __CHKP__ macro when Pointer Bounds Checker is on. > > OK for the trunk. > > So at this point do we have any patches that have not been reviewed for this > stage of the bounded pointers work? Are there any which you have posted > updated versions that you feel need further review?
Thanks for review! I see no more patches not reviewed at all. I see 4 more patches requiring approve before I can start a merge. Two of them are parts of split #14 (Passes): #14.3 (Helper functions) and #14.16 (Reduce bounds lifetime) There is also #32 (hooks for i386 target). It has concern about TBAA which I believe is not a problem in my case because accesses using different types are not mixed. The final one is #33 (MPX ABI). I still see fail on one benchmark but I don't feel ICE in LRA should prevent patch from been committed. Thanks, Ilya > > Jeff >
