On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > > If you look back at the patch I posted, there's a > > typo. :-} Duly warned about, but I'd rather expect the build to > > fail. > > Yes, strange that it didn't fail. There's no prototype for cf_fstrcpy, > and since we use std=gnu11 prototypes should be mandatory. Also, since > there's no symbol called cf_fstrcpy so at least the linking should > fail. Unless the link picked up some old inquire.o file?
For closure: no linking certainly *did* fail and no executable was created for those tests; failing linking correctly counts as a fail too. > > Apparently libgfortran is not compiled with -Werror, at least > > not for crosses. Maybe -Werror is there for native but I'm not > > sure as I see some "warning: array subscript has type 'char' > > [-Wchar-subscripts]" which seems generic and also some others. > > Though no more than can be fixed or excepted, IMHO. > > No, Werror isn't used. It was tried, but apparently caused issues. 'k. Maybe -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is a middle way. brgds, H-P
