VandeVondele Joost wrote: > >> So the negative version is -Wno-use-no-only? That sounds weird. > > What about -Wuse-without-only? > > Would be fine with me. Approved with this change ?
That would be the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-06/msg00114.html > +Warn if a use statement has no only qualifier and thus implicitly imports > +all public entities of the used module. I would use "USE statement" or even "@code{USE} statement". OK with the documentation change and with the re-named option. Please also update the name in the code. Regarding + USE foo, ONLY: bar ! { dg-bogus "has no ONLY qualifier" } + END SUBROUTINE + SUBROUTINE S3 + USE ISO_C_BINDING ! { dg-warning "has no ONLY qualifier" } + END SUBROUTINE S3 +END MODULE +! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "foo testmod" } } The "cleanup module" shouldn't be needed as most of the time that now happens automatically. And "dg-bogus" is also not really needed as the code checks for excess errors and warnings. On the other hand, it shouldn't do much harm either. Thanks for the patch! Regards, Tobias