> So the negative version is -Wno-use-no-only? That sounds weird. What about -Wuse-without-only?
I can also confirm that the test succeeds without the ' ! { dg-bogus "has no ONLY qualifier" }'. Dominique
> So the negative version is -Wno-use-no-only? That sounds weird. What about -Wuse-without-only?
I can also confirm that the test succeeds without the ' ! { dg-bogus "has no ONLY qualifier" }'. Dominique