> Ah, cool, I didn't know all that was in.
Well, the precision part is in, but the __intN part isn't yet. Each time I do a "final" check for regressions, something new has been added to gcc which breaks it all again... :-P
> Ah, cool, I didn't know all that was in.
Well, the precision part is in, but the __intN part isn't yet. Each time I do a "final" check for regressions, something new has been added to gcc which breaks it all again... :-P