On 08/06/14 13:45, DJ Delorie wrote:
That's one of the things that would be largely made irrelevant by
DJ's proposed changes. Instead of using PSImode,
What’s PSImode?
PSImode is a mode with more precision than HImode, but less than SImode.
we'd be able to define modes of precisely the number of bits one
of these targets needs.
Not quite, Jeff. We still use PSImode but now it has a known defined
precision, not just "fits in SImode", and may correspond to one of the
__intN types.
Ah, cool, I didn't know all that was in. Glad to know that we can
precisely define the precision of the partial modes.
There's still lots of places in gcc that use SIZE where they should
use PRECISION.
Yea, I suspect this is rather pervasive.
Jeff
