On 31/07/2014 00:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 17/06/2014 19:41, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> >>>> OK. I will do that. >>>> We should test the following: >>>> * default => run just -Wreturn-type >>>> * -Wreturn-type => Run both >>>> * -Wreturn-type + -Wmissing-return => Run both >>>> * -Wno-return-type + -Wmissing-return => Run just the second one >>>> * -Wno-return-type + -Wno-missing-return => Run none >>>> Do you see any other? >>> That looks like the right things to test, if there are no changes for >>> anything other than those options. >> Here it is: >> https://github.com/sylvestre/gcc/commit/db8aaac91aa09fd1ec1cc8974586aec45a221e71 >> >> Is that what you expected? > The test Wmissing-return2.c only has one of the two warnings. But as per > "-Wreturn-type => Run both", and for backwards compatibility with the > existing definition of -Wreturn-type, both warnings should appear for this > test. Make sense. Thanks for the feedback and the help. Here it is: https://github.com/sylvestre/gcc/commit/089ffc9fb85034111b892ee10190dc12b5dbe551
> (It's simply that only a subset of -Wreturn-type seems suitable to > enable by default for C. Maybe the default subset, -Wreturn-type > -Wno-missing-return (which is a combination that should also be included > in the testcases), should have its own option name, although I don't know > what that would be.) > What about implementing that in an further commit? I have touched more than 1200 test files and I would like to see that merged soon to avoid more conflicts. By the way, do you prefer a single commit for all tests or one per directory (gfortran, C++, gcc, OpenMP) ? Thanks Sylvestre