On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:54:30PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Jakub> Another possibility would be to give the macros twice as many arguments
> Jakub> as there are parameters and just through the odd arguments away when
> Jakub> expanding to the template parameters. That would mean you write
> Jakub> GCC_METHOD7 (gcc_decl, build_decl,
> Jakub> const char *, name,
> Jakub> enum gcc_c_symbol_kind, sym_kind,
> Jakub> const char *, substitution_name,
> Jakub> gcc_address, address,
> Jakub> const char *, filename,
> Jakub> unsigned int, line_number);
> Jakub> though it isn't very nice either, guess I'm bikeshedding... ;)
>
> Bikeshed away, I don't mind ... in this case :)
>
> I'm not super fond of this idea, though, I think because the names are
> all "useless" -- they don't have any meaning to any of the actual uses,
> they are just there for documentation purposes.
>
> One other random idea was something like:
>
> GCC_METHOD7 (gcc_decl, build_decl,
> const char *, /* Argument NAME. */
> enum gcc_c_symbol_kind, /* Argument SYM_KIND. */
LGTM.
Jakub
