On 05/22/14 07:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:52:05AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/16/14 09:26, Tom Tromey wrote:
2014-05-16 Phil Muldoon <pmuld...@redhat.com>
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tro...@redhat.com>
* gcc-c-fe.def: New file.
* gcc-c-interface.h: New file.
* gcc-interface.h: New file.
---
+GCC_METHOD7 (gcc_decl, build_decl,
+ const char */* name */,
+ enum gcc_c_symbol_kind /* sym_kind */,
+ gcc_type /* sym_type */,
+ const char */* substitution_name */,
+ gcc_address /* address */,
+ const char */* filename */,
+ unsigned int /* line_number */)
I must say that I hate the embedded comments in the signatures.
Especially when you end up with something like:
Why it can't be:
GCC_METHOD7 (gcc_decl, build_decl,
const char *name,
enum gfc_c_symbol_kind sym_kind,
...
i.e. provide comments in the form of argument names
(sure, you can't use bool for the name of the parameter then...).
No idea. I'd assumed they had it in a comment rather than in the
signature for a reason.
jeff
