On 05/26/2014 11:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* C++11 8.5/17: "If the destination type is an array of characters,
+ an array of char16_t, an array of char32_t, or an array of wchar_t,
+ and the initializer is a string literal...". */
+ else if (TREE_CODE (newrhs) == STRING_CST
+ && char_type_p (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (lhstype)))
+ && modifycode == INIT_EXPR)
+ {
+ newrhs = digest_init (lhstype, newrhs, complain);
+ if (newrhs == error_mark_node)
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
This hunk is OK.
if (TREE_CODE (init) == TREE_LIST
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
+ && TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE
+ /* C++11 8.5/17: "If the destination type is an array of characters,
+ an array of char16_t, an array of char32_t, or an array of wchar_t,
+ and the initializer is a string literal...". */
+ && !(char_type_p (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type)))
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (init)) == STRING_CST))
{
error ("cannot initialize arrays using this syntax");
return NULL_TREE;
Can we just remove this error rather than add a condition? I think it's
covered in other places.
The patch doesn't seem to fix
char s[] ("foo");
which I think also ought to be well-formed.
Jason
