On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/02/14 05:41, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> >> this should be all moved to the symbol table level. (and IDENTIFIER_NODE >> shouldn't have to have tree_common.chain and thus become smaller). > > Which ought to be independent of the pointer checking work. There's been > some proposals for making first class symbol tables in GCC, but nothing > that's made any progress at this point. Maybe I'll sick David on it at some > point.
You probably missed that we now have such symbol table (ok, it still lacks labels and CONST_DECLs). Richard. > jeff >
