Re: [PATCH, i386, Pointer Bounds Checker 10/x] Partitions

[Jeff Law]

On 06/02/14 05:41, Richard Biener wrote:

this should be all moved to the symbol table level.  (and IDENTIFIER_NODE
shouldn't have to have tree_common.chain and thus become smaller).
Which ought to be independent of the pointer checking work.  There's 
been some proposals for making first class symbol tables in GCC, but 
nothing that's made any progress at this point.  Maybe I'll sick David 
on it at some point.

jeff