On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:03:44PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/22/2014 09:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:38:31PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 05/22/2014 01:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:19PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> >>>>>>>>FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O0 execution test
> >>>>>>>Is that before or after r210743?
> >>>Can't reproduce the above (note, not bootstrapped compiler, just
> >>>--disable-bootstrap), check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=asan.exp is clean,
> >>Thanks Jakub. I'm not bootstrapping either, but all the fails are
> >>still there (fetched a fresh tree, built again). I have just noticed
> >>the below during the build, are expected?
> >In any case, I couldn't reproduce that even during fresh bootstrap/regtest
> >I did.
> I see. Some of the fails I'm seeing spill this kind of diagnostic,
> does that tell you something?
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C -O1 output pattern test, is
> ==18037==ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list;
> you should either link runtime to your application or manually
> preload it with LD_PRELOAD.
> , should match ERROR: AddressSanitizer:? heap-buffer-overflow on address[^
>
> ....
Do you have LD_PRELOAD set in the environment?
If not, can you cut'n'paste the large-func-test-1.exe command line
and run it with the given LD_LIBRARY_PATH under ldd?
Jakub
