Hi,
On 05/22/2014 09:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:38:31PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 05/22/2014 01:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:19PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/asan-interface-1.c -O0 execution test
Is that before or after r210743?
Can't reproduce the above (note, not bootstrapped compiler, just
--disable-bootstrap), check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=asan.exp is clean,
Thanks Jakub. I'm not bootstrapping either, but all the fails are
still there (fetched a fresh tree, built again). I have just noticed
the below during the build, are expected?
In any case, I couldn't reproduce that even during fresh bootstrap/regtest
I did.
I see. Some of the fails I'm seeing spill this kind of diagnostic, does
that tell you something?
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.C -O1 output pattern test, is
==18037==ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list; you
should either link runtime to your application or manually preload it
with LD_PRELOAD.
, should match ERROR: AddressSanitizer:? heap-buffer-overflow on address[^
....
Paolo.
