On 02 May 2014, at 17:57, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 May 2014 17:18, Oleg Endo wrote: >> Jonathan, >> >> now that we're in stage 1 again, I'd like to revive the issue below. Do >> you have any particular plans? How should we proceed? > > Hi Oleg, sorry for letting the thread die in January. > > We will definitely want to deal with the missing constructors in > <stdexcept> during stage 1, but I'm not sure exactly when :-) > > I'll come back to this next week - ping me if you don't hear from me again! And here I am, pinging... :) If it helps, I could brush up the patch that I submitted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01688.html The thing you've mentioned regarding exception message string storage in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01925.html is a different issue I think. Cheers, Oleg
