On 02 May 2014, at 17:57, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1 May 2014 17:18, Oleg Endo wrote:
>> Jonathan,
>> 
>> now that we're in stage 1 again, I'd like to revive the issue below.  Do
>> you have any particular plans?  How should we proceed?
> 
> Hi Oleg, sorry for letting the thread die in January.
> 
> We will definitely want to deal with the missing constructors in
> <stdexcept> during stage 1, but I'm not sure exactly when :-)
> 
> I'll come back to this next week - ping me if you don't hear from me again!

And here I am, pinging... :)

If it helps, I could brush up the patch that I submitted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01688.html

The thing you've mentioned regarding exception message string storage in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01925.html
is a different issue I think.

Cheers,
Oleg

Reply via email to