Hi,

This patch documents issues with singleton vector types in the 4.9 AArch64 backend.

"On AArch64, the singleton vector types int64x1_t, uint64x1_t and
float64x1_t exported by arm_neon.h are defined to be the same as their
base types.  This results in incorrect application of parameter passing
rules to arguments of types int64x1_t and uint64x1_t, with respect to
the AAPCS64 ABI specification.  In addition, names of C++ functions with
parameters of these types (including float64x1_t) are not mangled
correctly.  The current typedef declarations also unintentionally
allow implicit casting between singleton vector types and their base
types.  These issues will be resolved in a near future release.  See
PR60825 for more information."

OK for the wwwdocs repos?

Thanks,
Yufeng
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -r1.69 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 29 Apr 2014 18:31:24 -0000      1.69
+++ htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 1 May 2014 15:01:02 -0000
@@ -33,6 +33,20 @@
              announcement</a>.</li>
     </ul>
     </li>
+
+    <li><p>On AArch64, the singleton vector types <code>int64x1_t</code>,
+    <code>uint64x1_t</code> and <code>float64x1_t</code> exported by
+    <code>arm_neon.h</code> are defined to be the same as their base types.
+    This results in incorrect application of parameter passing rules to
+    arguments of types <code>int64x1_t</code> and <code>uint64x1_t</code>,
+    with respect to the AAPCS64 ABI specification.  In addition, names of
+    C++ functions with parameters of these types (including
+    <code>float64x1_t</code>) are not mangled correctly.  The current
+    <code>typedef</code> declarations also unintentionally allow implicit
+    casting between singleton vector types and their base types.  These
+    issues will be resolved in a near future release.  See
+    <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/PR60825";>PR60825</a> for more information.
+    </p></li>
   </ul>
 
   <p>

Reply via email to