On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> wrote: > This doesn't seem to have shown problems on trunk/4.9. > > I have bootstrapped and checked the patch on 4.8 > arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu. > > I have checked the patch on 4.7 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu. > > OK to backport to 4.8 and 4.7?
Ok by me but give 24 "working" hours for an RM to object. Ramana > > On 7 April 2014 16:02, Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 4 April 2014 15:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana....@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> Additionally the testing has only considered Thumb2 - since we also do >>> jumptable shortening for Thumb1 and given this late change it's worth >>> also testing this on Thumb1 and making sure there are no regressions. >>> Maybe Joey can help there if you aren't set up to do this. >>> >>> Ok if no regressions and modulo RM objections. >> >> I have tested v5t Thumb-1 with no regressions on qemu. >> >>> One minor Changelog nit. >>> >>> 2014-04-02 Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> >>> >>> PR target/60609 >>> * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_OUTPUT_CASE_END) Remove. >>> (LABEL_ALIGN_AFTER_BARRIER) Align barriers which occur after >>> ADDR_DIFF_VEC. >>> >>> s/)/):/g above. >> >> Noted.
