This doesn't seem to have shown problems on trunk/4.9. I have bootstrapped and checked the patch on 4.8 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu.
I have checked the patch on 4.7 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu. OK to backport to 4.8 and 4.7? On 7 April 2014 16:02, Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 April 2014 15:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana....@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Additionally the testing has only considered Thumb2 - since we also do >> jumptable shortening for Thumb1 and given this late change it's worth >> also testing this on Thumb1 and making sure there are no regressions. >> Maybe Joey can help there if you aren't set up to do this. >> >> Ok if no regressions and modulo RM objections. > > I have tested v5t Thumb-1 with no regressions on qemu. > >> One minor Changelog nit. >> >> 2014-04-02 Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> >> >> PR target/60609 >> * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_OUTPUT_CASE_END) Remove. >> (LABEL_ALIGN_AFTER_BARRIER) Align barriers which occur after >> ADDR_DIFF_VEC. >> >> s/)/):/g above. > > Noted.
