> Does this catch C99 VLAs? I vaguely recall we have a different internal > representation of those?!? And don't those have the same problem?
No, VLAs have explicit variable size so they are not problematic here. -- Eric Botcazou
> Does this catch C99 VLAs? I vaguely recall we have a different internal > representation of those?!? And don't those have the same problem?
No, VLAs have explicit variable size so they are not problematic here. -- Eric Botcazou