As far as I can tell, libsanitizer works on hppa-linux. So, the
change could be added to the llvm tree.
However, I'm unlikely to test anything in the tree unless someone
tells me there's something to test.
Dave
On 15-Nov-13, at 10:52 PM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Dave,
Do you want the asan/asan_linux.cc (# elif defined(__hppa__)) part to
be in the llvm tree?
--kcc
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:55 AM, John David Anglin <dave.ang...@bell.net
> wrote:
On 15-Nov-13, at 9:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:25 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 00:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2013-11-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:
Temporarily
ifdef out almost the whole source.
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_syscalls.inc:
Likewise.
That helps, but as Pat reported in the bugzilla, it still is
failing.
With the following patch, we can now bootstrap on powerpc64-linux.
Is this ok for trunk?
Does this help the other architectures that are failing for the
same
build error?
Ok, Dave reported in PR59009 that my last patch still left a few
build
problems on HPPA. Dave tested the patch below and confirmed this
cleans
How can there be problems on HPPA? libsanitizer/configure.tgt
says that
hppa* is UNSUPPORTED, so libsanitizer should never be built there.
Furthermore, it would be nice to understand why the sigaction is
different.
Actually, it turns out I have had a patch in my tree enabling it.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
