Dave, Do you want the asan/asan_linux.cc (# elif defined(__hppa__)) part to be in the llvm tree?
--kcc On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:55 AM, John David Anglin <dave.ang...@bell.net> wrote: > On 15-Nov-13, at 9:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:25 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 00:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 2013-11-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> >>>>> >>>>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc: >>>>> Temporarily >>>>> ifdef out almost the whole source. >>>>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_syscalls.inc: Likewise. >>>> >>>> >>>> That helps, but as Pat reported in the bugzilla, it still is failing. >>>> With the following patch, we can now bootstrap on powerpc64-linux. >>>> >>>> Is this ok for trunk? >>>> >>>> Does this help the other architectures that are failing for the same >>>> build error? >>> >>> >>> Ok, Dave reported in PR59009 that my last patch still left a few build >>> problems on HPPA. Dave tested the patch below and confirmed this cleans >> >> >> How can there be problems on HPPA? libsanitizer/configure.tgt says that >> hppa* is UNSUPPORTED, so libsanitizer should never be built there. >> Furthermore, it would be nice to understand why the sigaction is >> different. > > > > Actually, it turns out I have had a patch in my tree enabling it. > > Dave > -- > John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net > >
