This update makes it more safe. You showed me how to write better
expand code. Thank you for the improvement!



thanks,
Cong


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Cong Hou <co...@google.com> wrote:
>> I have run check_GNU_style.sh on my patch.
>>
>> The patch is submitted. Thank you for your comments and help on this patch!
>
> I have committed a couple of fixes/improvements to your expander in
> i386.c. There is no need to check for the result of
> expand_simple_binop. Also, there is no guarantee that
> expand_simple_binop will expand to the target. It can return different
> RTX. Also, unhandled modes are now marked with gcc_unreachable.
>
> 2013-10-31  Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>
>
>     * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_sse2_abs): Rename function arguments.
>     Use gcc_unreachable for unhandled modes.  Do not check results of
>     expand_simple_binop.  If not expanded to target, move the result.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and committed.
>
> Uros.

Reply via email to