On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > Ping?
Can you please get rid of PARTIAL_INT_MODE_NAME by making the name a required argument to PARTIAL_INT_MODE? Ok with that change (given target maintainers are ok with this). Thanks, Richard. > On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >> On Oct 18, 2013, at 4:24 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I agree. Btw, the "implementation defined" precision of PDI on SH-5 >>> definitely >>> looks interesting, but I wonder how you can perform "implementation defined" >>> arithmetic on that PDI mode then ;) >> >> Easy, perform it in the maximal size supported… >> >>> What else blocks this patch? >> >> Nothing. We have heard from everyone, and all the issues found by testing >> were on msp, and those were exclusively due to port issues that I believe >> now have been resolved. The below patch has the change to 22 bits for PSI >> on SH. >> >> Ok? >> >
