On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:59:14PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > + FOR_EACH_LOOP (li, loop, 0) > + if (loop->latch) > + FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, loop->latch->succs)
Isn't the only successor of loop->latch loop->header?
Thus, can't you just remove the above two lines and use loop->header
instead of e->dest?
Jakub
