On 21 October 2013 22:09, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > attached is a new version of the patch. Changes: > * "#pragma GCC ivdep" instead of "#pragma ivdep" > * Corrections to the error message in c-parser.c and a test case for it > * New wording in the .texi and examples
Not that I have any authority here, but I like the new wording better. And BTW, in the last exchange you pointed to a set of slides by B. Dinechin about the ivdep directive; it was in fact a conversation with him that prompted me to ask you about the semantics of your patch. I discussed the issue with him again today and he agreed that mapping that to safelen makes sense. Fred
