On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> writes: > > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Richard Sandiford > > <rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> offset_int, max_int, wi::to_offset and wi::to_max sound OK to me. > >> Kenny? Mike? > > > > Those two names seem reasonable. to_offset should document that these > > are for address offsets (and address constants) exclusively. > > Reading this back, I realise "max_int" might sound too similar to INT_MAX. > Maybe we could follow the current HOST_* stuff and use: offset_int, > widest_int, > wi::to_offset and wi::to_widest. > > Bah. I'm no good at naming stuff...
Nobody is ... but yes, offset_int and widest_int and wi::to_offset and wi::to_widest sounds good to me - both short and descriptive. Richard.
