Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> writes: > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> offset_int, max_int, wi::to_offset and wi::to_max sound OK to me. >> Kenny? Mike? > > Those two names seem reasonable. to_offset should document that these > are for address offsets (and address constants) exclusively.
Reading this back, I realise "max_int" might sound too similar to INT_MAX. Maybe we could follow the current HOST_* stuff and use: offset_int, widest_int, wi::to_offset and wi::to_widest. Bah. I'm no good at naming stuff... Richard
