On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:54PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Kenneth Zadeck <zad...@naturalbridge.com> wrote:
> >>> Does this look ok? Kenny, can you double check the cases, think I have
> >>> them right, but? a double check would be good.
> >> That works for me.
> >>
> > i talked to mike about this last night, but did not follow up with an email
> > until now. The problem is that this code is wrong!!! He is working to
> > fix that and so i would expect something from him later (tomorrow for those
> > in europe).
>
> Ok, updated the patch, here is what I checked in:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/wide-int.h b/gcc/wide-int.h
> index 2ff130b..738ae11 100644
> --- a/gcc/wide-int.h
> +++ b/gcc/wide-int.h
> @@ -185,7 +185,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
>
> assuming t is a int_cst.
>
> - Note that the bits above the precision are not defined and the
> + Note, the bits past the precision up to the nearest HOST_WDE_INT
WIDE?
Jakub
