On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > On 10/17/2013 07:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > Oh, so it was the tree rep that changed? _Why_ was it changed? > > We still cannot use it directly from wide-int and the extra > > word is redundant because we have access to TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE ()). > > > It was changed because you asked me to change it. However, you end up with > special cases either way.
It was a mis-communication - I thought you added this to the wide-int rep to be able to use both tree and RTX reps directly. Richard.
