On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Thanks. But then the function actually *is* implemented, saying 'not > implemented' is misleading. Please change the xml to something like 'isn't > correctly implemented', or more informally, 'needs work', up to you, but > please adjust it.
Committed. I learn that an implementation could be incorrect ;) -- Tim Shen
a.patch
Description: Binary data