On 10/02/2013 01:45 AM, Tim Shen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote:
Ok, thus just say that transform_primary is unimplented. Please also add a comment inline
in the code explaining the issue, but don't word it in term of <locale>, because
<locale> is just what it is per C++11, and doesn't directly provide what we need in
the public interface (if I understand the issue): just say that implementing the function
appears to require libc support + a link to the message you sent a couple of weeks ago to
the libstdc++-v3 mailing list.
Ok with the above changes.
Committed :)
Thanks. But then the function actually *is* implemented, saying 'not
implemented' is misleading. Please change the xml to something like
'isn't correctly implemented', or more informally, 'needs work', up to
you, but please adjust it.
Thanks,
Paolo.
