On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Perez Read <netfirew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> movabs is incorrectly translated into "mov [rax], -1", and causes >>> compile error "Error: ambiguous operand size for `mov' ". >>> It should be "mov QWORD PTR [rax], -1" >>> >>> Bootstrap passed. Regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (pc). >>> >>> 2013-08-10 Perez Read <netfirew...@gmail.com> >>> >>> * config/i386/i386.md (*movabs<mode>_1) : Add <ptrsize> PTR before >>> operand 0 for intel asm alternative. >>> >>> * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movabs-1.c : New test. >> >> You should mention PR number in the ChangeLog. >> >> Looks OK, but I think that for consistency this decoration should also >> be added to *movabs<mode>_2 pattern. >> >> Uros. > > Hello, > > After the test, I think we can skip this pattern. > Because the operand 0 must be the register, the assembler will > determine the size automatically. As said, I don't want two similar patterns with a different asm template in i386.md. So, if decorating movabs<mode>_2 works OK, I propose to change both patterns with your change. Uros.
