On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Janis Johnson <janis_john...@mentor.com> wrote: > Tests gcc.target/powerpc/20020118-1.c and > gcc.c-torture/execute/nest-align-1.c sometimes fail because they expect > a stack alignment that is greater than that required for powerpc-eabi. > This patch forces stack alignment to 128 bits by passing "-mno-eabi". > > Is this OK for mainline and the 4.8 branch, or would it be better to > skip these tests for powerpc-*-eabi*?
I don't have a strong preference either way, I'd defer to someone with an opinion. I have a weak preference for additional testing, so I like the patch.
